Reference Sources

Primary Sources

  • Watson, N. and Wooden, M. 2021. ‘The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey’, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik (Journal of Economics and Statistics), vol. 241, no. 1, pp. 131-141.
  • Watson, N. and Wooden, M. 2013. ‘Adding a top-up sample to the HILDA Survey’, Australian Economic Review, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 489–498.
  • Watson, N. and Wooden, M. 2012. ‘The HILDA Survey: A case study in the design and development of a successful household panel study’, Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 369–381.
  • Watson, N. and Wooden, M. 2010. ‘The HILDA Survey: Progress and future developments’, Australian Economic Review, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 326–336.
  • Wooden, M. and Watson, N. 2007. ‘The HILDA Survey and its contribution to economic and social research (so far)’, Economic Record, vol. 83, no. 261, pp. 208–231.
  • Watson, N. and Wooden, M. 2004. ‘The HILDA Survey: A summary’, Australian Journal of Labour Economics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 109–124.
  • Watson, N. and Wooden, M. 2004. ‘The HILDA Survey four years on’, Australian Economic Review, vol. 37, no.2, pp. 343–349.
  • Wooden, M. and Watson, N., 2002. ‘The HILDA Survey: What's in it for economists?’, Australian Journal of Labour Economics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 397–417.
  • Wooden, M., Freidin, S. and Watson, N. 2002. ‘The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey: Wave 1’, Australian Economic Review, vol. 35, no. 3., pp. 339–348.

Analyses of Response and Survey Collection Methods

  • Watson, N. and Wilkins, R., 2015. ‘Design matters: The impact of CAPI on interview length’, Field Methods, vol. 27, no.3, pp. 244-264.
  • Watson, N. and Wooden, M. 2014. ‘Re-engaging with survey non-respondents: Evidence from three household panels’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 499–522.
  • Watson, N. and Wooden, M., 2009. ‘Identifying factors affecting longitudinal survey response’, in P. Lynn (ed.), Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 157–179.
  • Watson, N. and Wooden, M. 2004. ‘Sample attrition in the HILDA Survey’, Australian Journal of Labour Economics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 293–308.

Other Reviews and Summary Papers

  • Wilkins, R., 2015. ‘Measuring income inequality in Australia’, Australian Economic Review, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 93–102.
  • Richardson, S. 2013. ‘A reflection on the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey’, The Australian Economic Review, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 216–222.
  • Schoeni, R.F., Stafford, F., McGonagle, K.A. and  Andreski, P. 2013. ‘Response rates in national panel surveys’, Annals of the  American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 645, pp. 60–87.
  • Schonlau, M., Kroh, M., and Watson, N. 2013. 'The implementation of cross-sectional weights in household panel surveys’, Statistics Surveys, vol. 7, pp. 37–57.
  • Kaiser, A. 2012. ‘A review of longitudinal datasets on ageing’, Journal of Population Ageing, vol. 6, nos. 1–2, pp. 5–27.
  • Schonlau, M., Watson, N. and Kroh, M. 2011. ‘Household survey panels:  How much do following rules affect sample size’, Survey Research Methods,  vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 53–61.
  • Watson, N. and Starick, R. 2011. ‘Evaluation of alternative income imputation methods for a longitudinal survey’, Journal of Official Statistics, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 693–715.
  • Scutella, R. and Wilkins, R. 2010. ‘Measuring social exclusion in Australia: Assessing existing data sources’, Australian Economic Review, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 449–463.
  • Bloxham, P. and Betts, T. 2009. ‘Measures of household wealth for Australia’, Australian Economic Review, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 217–231.
  • Dolan, P., Peasgood, T. and White, M. 2008. ‘Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being’, Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 94–122.
  • Frick, J., Jenkins, S., Lillard, D., Lipps, O. and Wooden, M. 2008. ‘Die internationale einbettung des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels (SOEP) im Rahmen des Cross-National Equivalent File (CNEF)’, Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung (Quarterly Journal of Economic Research), vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 110–129.
  • Burkhauser, R.V. and Lillard, D.R. 2007. ‘The expanded cross-national equivalent file: HILDA joins its international peers’, Australian Economic Review, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 208–215.
  • Frick, J., Jenkins, S., Lillard, D., Lipps, O. and Wooden, M. 2007. ‘The Cross-National Equivalent File (CNEF) and its member country household panel studies’, Journal of Applied Social Science Studies (Schmollers Jahrbuch), vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 627–654.
  • Watson, N. and Wooden, M. 2004. ‘The HILDA Survey: A summary’, Australian Journal of Labour Economics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 109–124.
  • Watson, N. and Wooden, M. 2002. ‘The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey: An introduction’, Australian Social Policy, 2001–02, pp. 79–99.
  • Weston, R. and Wooden, M., 2002. ‘HILDA has arrived! New survey on Australian households and families’, Family Matters, no. 63, pp. 66–73.
  • Wooden, M., Freidin, S. and Watson, N. 2002. ‘Enhancing the evidence base for economic and social policy in Australia: The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey’, Mercer–Melbourne Institute Quarterly Bulletin of Economic Trends, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 17–20.